Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: JR Sprint input?????


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 227
Date:
JR Sprint input?????


There have been track test's and discussion on the new "4 stroke" Jr Sprint motor. I would like some input from "ALL" the Jr Sprint Teams on this subject. Some items of discussion are, which motor, when should it be run (this season, next season), R&D testing this season, ect......


DISCLAIMER: Remember, this thread is only to gleen info from the group! It is not intended to incite a battle between groups nor to become a "BITCH SESSION"!!!! Please limit your coments to positive input for the good of the group and club!!!!! If it should become counter productive I will ask the "Web Master's" to eliminate it..... Also remember, this will strictly be an "Advisory Discussion"


That being said, "EVERYONE" has input, lets hear it!!!! If you'd rather, feel free to pm or e-mail me...... Thanks for your "POSITIVE INPUT", Doug    MadMackRace@yahoo.com


 


 



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 373
Date:

I guess the first priority should be to identify what factors would drive the decision to search for another motor:  Closer competition? Noise? Price? Fewer stalls?


That being said, the NMMA still allows a 4 stroke option, the Briggs "World Formula" 200cc.  Looks like turn key w/ clutch and electric start they are just under $1000.  I Don't know what a good KT100 costs right now.  I would think the NMMA rules are likely written to make either powerplant competitive, though I don't know how much we have deviated from the national J-class with the KT's.  Not saying the WF is the answer, just highlighting it as a nationally sanctioned option for 4-stroke.


I certainly see advantages in the idle ability, on-board starting, and potentially a noise reduction over the coffee can muffler.  To me, it looks like the challenge of keeping the KT running at idle/low speed has made it tougher on the kids to learn line-ups and starts, and without a doubt adds to time spent on line up and caution laps.


Also a potential for more complicated tech procedures but maybe a claimer rule would be the easiest way to solve such concerns.  Say $200 over retail, and you're not going to play too much, and won't be too sad about getting rid of your old used motor for a brand new one!



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 36
Date:

 As a fan for a number of years, anything to either: A) cut down on the noise that the "chain saw" motors make by exhaust muffling would be appreciated by all I think, and B) make the cars easier to control at low speed would also be a bunch nicer for the drivers, I think, as well. Overall these two changes would make the kids alot more pleasant to watch, at least in my humble opinion. Kudos for the ideas, hope they work out ....

__________________

STUPID SHOULD HURT.......

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us